Journal: Advanced Science
Article Title: Micro‐Organ Chip Deciphers Tumor‐Derived G‐CSF as Remote Commander of Lung Pre‐Metastatic Niche via VEGFA‐KDR Cascade
doi: 10.1002/advs.202518584
Figure Lengend Snippet: The VEGFA‐KDR Signaling Axis Drives Pulmonary PMN Formation. A) Left : Schematic of the micro‐organ chip‐based experimental workflow for validating VEGFA‐induced PMN formation . Right : Representative fluorescence images of 4T1‐GFP+ cell colonization in PBS‐ versus VEGFA‐treated lung tissue clusters and normalized colonization density (cells per cluster). (Scale bars: 500 µm; n=3; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 by two‐tailed t‐test). B) Immunofluorescence analysis of lung tissues after PBS/VEGFA treatment: Nuclei (DAPI, blue), Angiogenesis (CD31, yellow), Microvasculature (EMCN, red), KDR expression (green), ECM remodeling (Fibronectin, green; Vimentin, yellow). (Scale bars: 30 µm), and quantification of CD31+, CD31+EMCN+ (CAP cells), KDR+ fractions in CAP cells, Fibronectin and Vimentin deposition. (n=3; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by two‐tailed t‐test). C) IF and IHC of in vivo lung sections from VEGFA‐infused mice showing CD31, KDR, and VEGFA expression, and marker‐positive area quantification. (Scale bars: 60 µm (IF), 40 µm (IHC); n=3 mice/group; *p < 0.05 , **p < 0.01 , ***p < 0.01 by t‐test). D) Schematic of the micro‐organ chip based experimental workflow for validating receptor‐dependent KDR activation, and signaling specificity of the VEGFA‐KDR axis. Top : 4T1‐GFP+ colonization in VEGFA protein and vehicle versus VEGFA protein and cabozantinib groups. Bottom : 4T1‐GFP+ colonization in tumor co‐cultured lung tissue clusters with isotype control versus αVEGFA antibody groups. E) Left : Normalized colonization density (cells per cluster) of 4T1‐GFP+ cell colonization in VEGFA protein and vehicle versus VEGFA protein and cabozantinib groups. Right : Normalized colonization density (cells per cluster) of 4T1‐GFP+ cell colonization in tumor‐lung co‐cultures with isotype control versus anti‐VEGFA. (Scale bars: 500 µm; n=3; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by two‐tailed t‐test). F) Quantification of CD31+EMCN+ (CAP cells), KDR+ fractions in CAP cells, Fibronectin deposition in VGEFA protein combine with cabozantinib or vehicle. (n=3; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by two‐tailed t‐test). G) IF and IHC analysis of lung tissues from orthotopic tumor‐bearing and VEGFA antibody or isotype control‐treated mice. Representative images of CD31 (angiogenesis), KDR (target engagement), and VEGFA (pro‐angiogenic signaling) in lung sections and quantification of marker‐positive areas. (Scale bars: 60 µm (IF), 100 and 40 µm (IHC); n = 3 mice/group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by two‐tailed t‐test).
Article Snippet: For pharmacological interventions, the system was treated with cabozantinib malate (XL184, 1.5 μ m ; Selleck) or vehicle (DMSO), recombinant VEGF164 (5 ng μL −1 ; MedChemExpress), anti‐mouse VEGF‐A neutralizing antibody (2G11‐2A05, 1 ng μL −1 ; Bio X Cell), recombinant G‐CSF (10 ng μL −1 ; Servicebio), or anti‐mouse G‐CSF antibody (MAB414, 1 ng μL −1 ; R&D Systems).
Techniques: Fluorescence, Two Tailed Test, Immunofluorescence, Expressing, In Vivo, Marker, Activation Assay, Cell Culture, Control, Drug discovery